Grave and Gathering Danger by Miroslav Volf "A grave and gathering danger" is hanging over our world. It is not so much the danger that Saddam Hussein presents for the free world, as President Bush has claimed in his September 12 speech before United Nations. It is the danger of American preventive war against Iraq. The Bush administration believes that such a war is necessary to remove Saddam from power and to prevent him from acquiring nuclear capabilities and deploying them along with biological and chemical weapons already in his possession. There is no doubt that Saddam's regime is evil, oppressive and cruel toward its own citizenry, especially minorities, and that it represents a major threat to its near and distant neighbors. As Christians committed to the justice and well-being of all people, we must condemn Saddam's injustices, undertake measures to ensure the safety of neighboring nations, and work toward a just government in Iraq. These same commitments should lead us, however, to condemn most emphatically the proposed preventive war against Iraq. Many have raised questions about the political prudence and legality of such a war. It is likely to bring long-term instability to a sensitive and volatile region and inflame Islamic extremism. The war would also violate standards of international law and create a dangerous precedent for other nations (such as China, India, Pakistan, Russia) to engage in preventive wars which, from their perspective, are as justified as the present U.S. administration deems its war against Iraq to be. Such political and legal considerations are reason enough not to start a war against Iraq. In addition, as Christians we must highlight compelling moral reasons against such a war and draw attention to the grave consequences it would have for already tense Christian-Muslim relations. A preventive war against Iraq is morally unacceptable for a very simple reason: It cannot be just to condemn masses of people to certain death in order to avert potential death of an equal or lesser number of people. President Bush seems intent to act as if the entire population of Iraq consisted of one single person named Saddam Hussein. In his speech before the United Nations the suffering of the Iraqi people -- who themselves oppose American intervention as much as they dislike their cruel leader -- figured only as motivation for war, but not as an inescapable consequence of the war. Yet the death-toll among Iraqi population in the planned preventive war is likely greatly to exceed estimated 100,000 Iraqi casualties during the 1991 Gulf war. The proposed war would pile suffering upon suffering for Iraqi people who groan under the iron fist of their leader and the misfortunes he has brought upon them. And we should not forget likely American casualties, estimated by some around 20,000 to 30,000. The most disturbing aspect of President Bush's justification of the preventive war against Iraq is seeming obliviousness to the immense suffering it would cause. In addition to being indefensible on moral grounds, preventive war against Iraq would have deleterious consequences for already difficult relations between Christians and Muslims. In the popular Muslim perception, the West, and in particular, America is identified with Christianity. A war by America, led by a president who publicly declares himself a devout Christian, against a Muslim nation -- even if it is a nation whose regime is disliked by the majority of Muslim nations -- would be seen as a crusade against Islam. Daily pictures of suffering Iraqis in the media throughout the Islamic world would fuel extremism and push many young people into terrorist networks. Even more importantly (if one takes a long term view of things), the war would make all efforts at dialogue between Christianity and Islam extremely difficult. As a result, an important venue to bridge a gulf and lessen tensions between these two great traditions would be closed. Since Christianity and Islam together have more than 3 billion adherents, the immense negative political consequences of religious tensions between these two bodies would be inescapable. The preventive war against Iraq is not "a great moral cause and a great strategic goal," as President Bush claims. For political, legal, moral, and inter-faith reasons, it is imperative for Christians unequivocally to condemn the prospect of such a war. Christians should organize demonstrations, the leaders of its churches should make public statements, individuals should place their signatures on petitions to prevent the leaders of our nation from engaging in an immoral and unwise war. The evil of Saddam's regime is not in question. The means proposed by President Bush for combating are likely to be even more evil. (c) 2002 Miroslav Volf .